How Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a nutshell: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (adjust some punctuation in the non-attributed paragraph; I'll avoid editing the attributed/signed paragraph though it's tempting) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In a nutshell [[Consumerium:Itself|Consumerium]] differs from [[Wikipedia]] in a fundamental way in that wikipedia is necessarily a [[consensus]] aimed project due to | In a nutshell [[Consumerium:Itself|Consumerium]] differs from [[Wikipedia]] in a fundamental way in that wikipedia is necessarily a [[consensus]] aimed project due to its stated goal of being an [[w:encyclopedia|encyclopedia]], which quite directly imposes the necessity to always claim [[NPOV]]; in contrast with consumerium, which is a consensus and [[dissensus]] project simultaneously. | ||
This fundamental difference that exists because of the different natures of these projects undermines the '''"always avoid the Wikipedia ways"'''-argumentation that has nearly deflated to the level of [[trollism|one-party]] rethoric. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] [[Lowest Troll]] of [[Consumerium]] | This fundamental difference that exists because of the different natures of these projects undermines the '''"always avoid the Wikipedia ways"'''-argumentation that has nearly deflated to the level of [[trollism|one-party]] rethoric. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] [[Lowest Troll]] of [[Consumerium]] |
Latest revision as of 22:18, 19 August 2005
In a nutshell Consumerium differs from Wikipedia in a fundamental way in that wikipedia is necessarily a consensus aimed project due to its stated goal of being an encyclopedia, which quite directly imposes the necessity to always claim NPOV; in contrast with consumerium, which is a consensus and dissensus project simultaneously.
This fundamental difference that exists because of the different natures of these projects undermines the "always avoid the Wikipedia ways"-argumentation that has nearly deflated to the level of one-party rethoric. --Juxo Lowest Troll of Consumerium