E-waste: Difference between revisions

957 bytes added ,  19 September 2013
m
Reverted edits by 46.161.41.32 (talk) to last revision by Juboxi
(xuPMoFcVryUzFgYR)
m (Reverted edits by 46.161.41.32 (talk) to last revision by Juboxi)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
wPj7br <a href="http://szkturyupgap.com/">szkturyupgap</a>, [url=http://nknalmfdybzf.com/]nknalmfdybzf[/url], [link=http://ccmatfoluxbm.com/]ccmatfoluxbm[/link], http://qcomliebrdau.com/
'''e-waste''' (never spelled with a capital E) is [[waste]] from [[electronics]].  It is often [[toxic waste]]. Also some types of electronics like [[cell phone]]s are thrown away on average once a year.  Many projects focus on [[electronics re-use]] and [[electronics recycling]], and [[electronics standards]] to minimize [[obsolescence]].  Such choices as [[Java]] as the programming language could be affected as they require more hardware.  Recognizing what are not real [[hardware requirements]] is critical to any [[healthy signal infrastructure]] - ideal minimal infrastructure is in effect already installed, already there, and requires no new [[tantallum]].
 
References:
 
*[http://cbc.ca/stories/2002/11/06/microchip021106 CBC News story], "it takes at least 1.6 kilograms of fossil fuels and chemical inputs to produce a single two-gram memory chip for personal computers."
*[http://www.esheep.org/story/EpFZEVlAuZhGdjRkIR.shtml UNU study], "weight for weight, the average computer chip does more harm to the environment than the car."
*[http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue8_8/critical/ a social ecology of wireless communication]
9,842

edits