Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,842
edits
Consumerium talk:Conventions: Difference between revisions
Here's my suggestion for conventions on articles starting with Identifying
mNo edit summary |
(Here's my suggestion for conventions on articles starting with Identifying) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Post your suggestions for [[Consumerium:Conventions|Conventions]] here''' | '''Post your suggestions for [[Consumerium:Conventions|Conventions]] here''' | ||
Important ones go to the top or whatever order you please. | Important ones go to the top or whatever order you please. | ||
---- | |||
Here's my suggestion for conventions on articles starting with [[Identifying]], but I'm too tired to evaluate if I should post this to the "normative" page. [[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 01:23 Jun 12, 2003 (EEST) | |||
* [[Identifying]] - Articles that start with word "Identifying" followed by a [[Consumerium Concept]] are supposed to fullfill the following requirements: | |||
**They are to be thought to be normative for [[XML]] developers (optimally describing one [[element]]) | |||
**They describe the [[attribute]](s) used to make this element uniquely identified. In some situations there might be multiple alternative/complimenting identification schemes to achieve interoperability, with other systems eg. Countries could be identified by TLD or ISO-3166-1 | |||
**They include at least one way of obtaining this [[unique key]] or several parallel ways when possible. Suggestions for source of [[reference]] should be included | |||
**They describe the [[pragmatic]], [[moral]], [[technological]] and [[economical]] considerations for the chosen identification method | |||
**They might describe the contained elements and attributes (ie. the content of the element) | |||
---- | ---- | ||