Claims of corruption: Difference between revisions

526 bytes removed ,  9 September 2004
moving the "link transit" issue to FUCOC
(moving the "no-independent board" claim to FUCOC)
(moving the "link transit" issue to FUCOC)
Line 97: Line 97:
:::This is the FIRST time ANY officer of [[Wikimedia]] has answered them, after DOZENS of attempts to simply censor them.  Your own response is inadequate in many respects, and includes many attempts to [[spin]] things (like labelling as "allegation" the supporting [[fact]]s themselves which no one has disputed).
:::This is the FIRST time ANY officer of [[Wikimedia]] has answered them, after DOZENS of attempts to simply censor them.  Your own response is inadequate in many respects, and includes many attempts to [[spin]] things (like labelling as "allegation" the supporting [[fact]]s themselves which no one has disputed).


=== recently dealt with ===


*''Allegation:'' withholding of information regarding [[link transit]] at [[Wikipedia]] which would be very useful to editors, but also quite profitable for a [[search engine]] like Bomis;  several attempts to raise this issue have been suppressed;  in September 2004 [[User:TimStarling]] did some code to start to deal with it.
::have no idea of this myself.
::since it is the only recent issue listed, I fail to see well how corruption has increased overtime.
:::Read [[link transit]]


=== individual corruption by officers ===
=== individual corruption by officers ===
9,842

edits