Jump to content

Article hub: Difference between revisions

957 bytes added ,  23 April 2012
restoring last un-vandalized version.
(clarifying : there is no ontological distinction between research and opinion: research is the opinion of a researcher)
(restoring last un-vandalized version.)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
==Development==
==Development==
[[Consumerium:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome, newcomers]]. This is the [[Development Wiki]], formerly know as the R&D Wiki, where we are planning operation of [[Research Wiki]] and [[Publish Wiki]](s)  
[[Consumerium:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome, newcomers]]. This is the [[Development Wiki]], formerly know as the R&D Wiki, where we are planning operation of [[Research Wiki]], [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Publish Wiki]](s)  


This [[wiki]] has been online since March 2003 and the [[past|original mission statement]] was published in April 2002. [[Timeline of Consumerium]] tracks the most prominent changes in our development work.
This [[wiki]] has been online since March 2003 and the [[past|original mission statement]] was published in April 2002. [[Timeline of Consumerium]] tracks the most prominent changes in our development work.
Line 6: Line 6:
Originally the plan was to store information in [[XML]] and rely heavily on systemic checks on data at entry time. Nowerdays the plan has shifted to utilizing [[wiki]]s and peer-review for accuracy.
Originally the plan was to store information in [[XML]] and rely heavily on systemic checks on data at entry time. Nowerdays the plan has shifted to utilizing [[wiki]]s and peer-review for accuracy.


We are aiming to get [[Consumerium Services]] into the shelf front where the purchasing decisions are made, but it looks much more likely that we are going to focus on enabling changing repeat-buy behaviour, so called [[Checkout Consumerium]] where you grab the [[product identification]] information to your cell phone via [[Near Field Communication]] and then connect that to your home computer to examine alternate consumption choices.
We are aiming to get [[Consumerium Services]] into the shelf front where the purchasing decisions are made, but it looks much more likely that we are going to focus on enabling changing repeat-buy behaviour, so called [[Checkout Consumerium]] where you grab the [[product identification]] information to your cell phone via [[Near Field Communication]] and then touch your home computer to examine alternate consumption choices.
----
 
==What's going on?==
It's mostly about some [[POVs|view point disagreements]] and disagreements about various [[ISMs]]. Also opposition for re-introduction of [[Opinion Wiki]] into the total plan of how to make this workable in the real world is heated.
 
Much attention is needed to define the [[Consumerium:Intermediate page types]] to enable [[Consumerium:We|us]] to launch a [[Research Wiki pilot]]. Also [[Simple model for expressing opinions]] (within Research Wiki) should be sanity checked and details scrutinized in the light of usability and software performance.
----
----


Line 16: Line 22:
Currently [[research]] is dispersed to multiple sites such as [[Wikipedia]] for generic, encyclopedic information, [[CorpKnowPedia]] for information on corporations and [[Wiktionary]] for translation needs. This is not a problem since all points of research are licensed under [[GFDL]]
Currently [[research]] is dispersed to multiple sites such as [[Wikipedia]] for generic, encyclopedic information, [[CorpKnowPedia]] for information on corporations and [[Wiktionary]] for translation needs. This is not a problem since all points of research are licensed under [[GFDL]]


Note:  there is no [[ontological distinction]] between research and opinion:  research is the opinion of a researcher.  And anyone can be a "researcher". Thus, opinions are indistinguishable from other forms of research - except that one could say "facts are research, and analysis is opinion.  [[Critical Point of View]] articles that don't even pretend to be [[NPOV|neutral]].  These are part of "research" but clearly marked. They are often drawn from outside text, in the form of [[campaign]]s for and against some entity, such as [[company]], [[product group]], [[product|individual product]], [[area]] ([[country]], [[ecoregion]]) or a piece of [[advertising]] which is clearly promotional.  An opinion starts as the lowest-credibility form of research and those who provide it will often be engaged with the [[Lowest Troll]] to determine if the authors or transmitters or republishers are [[funded troll]]s being paid to trash or promote some commercial service.
Note:  there is no [[ontological distinction]] between research and opinion:  research is the opinion of a researcher.  And anyone can be a "researcher".   Thus, opinions are indistinguishable from other forms of research - except that one could say "facts are research, and analysis is opinion."  
 
There's some question of what to do with [[Critical Point of View]] articles that don't even pretend to be [[NPOV|neutral]].  These are part of "research" but must be clearly marked - maybe awaiting [[answer recommendation]] filters?  
 
They are often drawn from outside text, maybe via [[corpus import]], e.g.[[campaign]]s for and against some entity[[company]], [[product group]], [[product|individual product]], [[area]] ([[country]], [[ecoregion]].  They may be a piece of [[advertising]] which is clearly promotional
 
Separating them is unwise.  An opinion starts as the lowest-credibility form of research, undergoes [[TIPAESA]] debate, and those who provide it will often be engaged with the [[Lowest Troll]] to determine if the authors or transmitters or republishers are [[funded troll]]s being paid to trash or promote some commercial service.  But no one will volunteer to separate "research" from "opinion" and to do so simply creates unaccountable [[sysop power structure]].


----
----
Line 37: Line 49:
----
----
==Trolling==
==Trolling==
The basic philosophical stance of [[trolling]] is compactly presented in '''[[Trollism]]''' an almost entirely diametrical to that of [[Sysopism]]
Consumerium Development Wiki could humorously be called "the encyclopedia of [[trolling]]" so far has our main [[troll]], [[142.177.X.X]], [[trolling|trolled]] with the help of other [[trolls]], some choosing a maybe shared account, some choosing to remain anonymous identified only by [[IP number]]
Consumerium Development Wiki could humorously be called "the encyclopedia of [[trolling]]" so far has our main [[troll]], [[142.177.X.X]], [[trolling|trolled]] with the help of other [[trolls]], some choosing a maybe shared account, some choosing to remain anonymous identified only by [[IP number]]


Line 65: Line 80:
</td>
</td>
<td>
<td>
===[[Links]]===
===[[Links]]===
* [[Wikipedia|Links To Wikipedia]]
* [[Wikipedia|Links To Wikipedia]]
9,842

edits

We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.