Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption
Evidence of Wikimedia corruption includes:
- false claims added to Wikimedia article here, and true claims removed
- technological escalation against Recyclopedia and threatened against Wikinfo
- no independent board free of influence from Bomis.com
- "Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made
- users not consulted when user environment changes
- no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board"
- libel chill by Wales
- solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines
- withholding of information regarding link transit at Wikipedia which would be very useful to editors, but also quite profitable for a search engine like Bomis
- outing and concomitant libel based on echo chamber claims
- sysop vandalism most notably by Auntie Angela
- sysop vigilantiism and more serious developer vigilantiism, notably by Tim Starling and Erik Moeller
- ad hominem delete without process, recently spread to Meta-Wikipedia
- ad hominem revert allowed to stand, including clearly racist ones, e.g. on Islam articles by Zionists, pointing to articles primarily written BY Zionists
- U.S. and U.K. centric editorial policy, set by people who speak only English