Search results
- ...[[Greenpeace]], [[Disinfopedia]], [[Recyclopedia]], [[Adbusters]], [[Green Parties]], [[Amnesty]], [[labour organization]]s, other [[NGO]]s, and etc.3 KB (366 words) - 15:50, 13 March 2004
- ...under the supervision of an [[independent board]] would potentially elect parties to the following roles that require extreme judgement:2 KB (377 words) - 18:09, 9 September 2004
- ...res such as lawsuits and reprisals are already being contemplated by a few parties. There are constant [[threats]], for instance, to sue Wikipedia out of exi3 KB (439 words) - 20:20, 25 December 2003
- ...would be most efficient, especially if existing institutions like poltical parties and NGOs agreed to cooperate in factions matching their own politics and as4 KB (566 words) - 07:39, 25 June 2003
- ...sing the maximum amount of reliable information, but would not require all parties involved to trust each other equally in [[wiki management]].3 KB (559 words) - 06:38, 29 February 2004
- ...or between you and the buyer and helps in fulfilling the needs of both the parties. They will assist in communication and also relay requirements and comments2 KB (361 words) - 06:37, 23 June 2016
- ...ad", but no democracy exists on Earth without multiple competing political parties, so the evidence is otherwise. One-party states tend to be stagnant and fa2 KB (332 words) - 20:14, 16 July 2012
- ...each other. In democracy this means dividing into pro- and anti-ape mother parties that debate the actual policy while a pan-sapien bureaucracy implements the2 KB (283 words) - 14:19, 12 April 2021
- ...functionality of our markup and simulate different situations eg. handling parties who wish to input [[Disinformation]] to undermine the [[Integrity]] and [[R ::::You don't like parties?8 KB (1,251 words) - 02:00, 17 April 2004
- ...above work, and prevents [[legal struggle]] which would bring in unwanted parties, e.g. lawyers, who would come to the table with "ideas", which would be bad4 KB (614 words) - 18:17, 1 July 2003
- ...eem to be enough, but it isn't. A much more rigorous view of the affected parties of any transaction or edit must be there - one must know roughly the balanc4 KB (618 words) - 17:38, 2 July 2004
- ...ation. Being able perhaps to re-integrate the semantic web after multiple parties have edited the different factional sections independently... all up for g4 KB (690 words) - 15:59, 3 June 2004
- ...re above. This might let groups like [[Amnesty International]] or [[Green Parties]] or [[Simultaneous Policy Organization]] or [[Greenpeace]] run a part of t4 KB (636 words) - 01:19, 27 October 2003
- *Third parties will be able to read our barcodes2 KB (346 words) - 22:20, 23 September 2020
- ...ed out on worrying how some of these off-topic ramblings must seem to some parties that we're going to have to convince that we're making sense. [[User:Juxo|J5 KB (818 words) - 06:37, 27 April 2003
- ...r for all citizens if the most contentious politicians ally into political parties, and we only hear from them every few years at election time. Anything els5 KB (835 words) - 23:09, 13 July 2004
- :## From third parties4 KB (679 words) - 11:03, 11 July 2005
- How [[Four Pillars]] (of [[Green Parties]], [[peace movement]], [[ecology movement]], [[altermondialiste]]s) can hel4 KB (578 words) - 12:19, 19 August 2004
- '''Living Platform'''s are [[wiki]]s that help citizens or groups or parties create [[w:en:political platform|political platform]]s. They are used at p3 KB (460 words) - 12:48, 24 April 2012
- ...ether his or her disaster, I really believe that have has demonstrated all parties involved how to overcome this kind of highly effective direct turbine depen3 KB (519 words) - 17:49, 6 June 2014