Consumerium:Philosophy: Difference between revisions

m
Reverted edits by 192.42.116.22 (talk) to last revision by Jukeboksi
(Replaced content with "There's a bomb in scumbag Fraser Anning's office right now. By, unclenicolini")
Tag: Replaced
m (Reverted edits by 192.42.116.22 (talk) to last revision by Jukeboksi)
Tag: Rollback
Line 1: Line 1:
There's a bomb in scumbag Fraser Anning's office right now.
Simple is beautiful, natural and good. Or is it some other way around?


By,
Philosophy boils down to that if we combine '''information''' about production processes, '''buying power''' and '''compassionate hearts''' then something good will come out of it.


unclenicolini
Consumerium does not seek to artificially alter the functioning of [[market economy]], lazy as we are, we leave that to the politicians.
 
Consumerium simply aims to make things more transparent to the [[consumer]] so s/he ''can'' see further and exert '''[[moral purchasing]] power''' with the same $$$ as before. It is up to the consumer to decide what to do with this enhanced view into economic processes and increased power, if anything.
 
[[Product]]s in the common case consist of three things: [[Material]], [[Information]] and [[Energy]]. To merge or forge or transform ''materials'' is actually ''embedding information'' into the ''material'' which takes ''energy'' to do.
 
We would like in particular to avoid [[governance]] problems that arise when we trust our own judgement too much, permit bad examples from elsewhere to be mimicked without justification, allow conflicts of interest, etc.
9,854

edits