Talk:Wiki witchhunt: Difference between revisions
('''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.''''
) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.'''' | '''Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.'''' | ||
:There is extremely strong circumstantial evidence that [[Wikimedia]] and [[MediaWiki]] promoters were directly involved in [[vandalbot]] attacks just before the final [[denial of service attack]]. It is not clear whether this is what discouraged Recyclopedia's founder from continuing, but it seems likely. This is far more valid than a "conspiracy theory". | |||
If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt | If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist [[Recyclopedia]] studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt | ||
Revision as of 16:02, 3 May 2004
Recyclopedia is down and there are numerous conspiracy theories floated by trolls about it.'
- There is extremely strong circumstantial evidence that Wikimedia and MediaWiki promoters were directly involved in vandalbot attacks just before the final denial of service attack. It is not clear whether this is what discouraged Recyclopedia's founder from continuing, but it seems likely. This is far more valid than a "conspiracy theory".
If you want to know more about it, the more anarchist Recyclopedia studies it, so see their article on it: *http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=wiki_witchhunt