Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption: Difference between revisions
(this is just evidence, it isn't a conclusion - any more?) |
(amazing! Wikimedia will not release the complete results of its "election" to the "Board" - of course this proves they are fascists) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Evidence of '''Wikimedia corruption''' includes: | Evidence of '''Wikimedia corruption''' includes: | ||
*withholding [[Wikimedia Board of Trustees]] election results from the voters! [http://mail.wikimedia.org/pipermail/foundation-l/2004-June/000360.html apparently there will be NO release of figures (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo] the [[GodKing]] of Wikimedia and [[Bomis]] | |||
*false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed | *false claims added to [[Wikimedia]] article here, and true claims removed | ||
*[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]] | *[[technological escalation]] against [[Recyclopedia]] and threatened against [[Wikinfo]] | ||
Revision as of 20:36, 16 June 2004
Evidence of Wikimedia corruption includes:
- withholding Wikimedia Board of Trustees election results from the voters! apparently there will be NO release of figures (!), even on a sitewide basis, according to directives by Jimbo the GodKing of Wikimedia and Bomis
- false claims added to Wikimedia article here, and true claims removed
- technological escalation against Recyclopedia and threatened against Wikinfo
- no independent board free of influence from Bomis.com
- "Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made
- users not consulted when user environment changes
- no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board"
- libel chill by Wales
- solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines
- withholding of information regarding link transit at Wikipedia which would be very useful to editors, but also quite profitable for a search engine like Bomis
- outing and concomitant libel based on echo chamber claims
- sysop vandalism most notably by Auntie Angela
- sysop vigilantiism and more serious developer vigilantiism, notably by Tim Starling and Erik Moeller
- ad hominem delete without process, recently spread to Meta-Wikipedia
- ad hominem revert allowed to stand, including clearly racist ones, e.g. on Islam articles by Zionists, pointing to articles primarily written BY Zionists
- U.S. and U.K. centric editorial policy, set by people who speak only English