Consumerium talk:Executive summary: Difference between revisions
(No way. This is not going to be removed. ) |
(fixing it) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This is really really bad. It says nothing specific or concrete. It is full of abstract phrases that mean nothing. | This is really really bad. It says nothing specific or concrete. It is full of abstract phrases that mean nothing. | ||
:No. It is very clear terminology for executives and every sentence says something either about how things are in business now or how we hope to change how the business is. | :No. It is very clear terminology for executives and every sentence says something either about how things are in business now or how we hope to change how the business is. | ||
::No, it's bad writing. It's gone. | |||
It really must go. Picking good questions of the FAQ is a far better way to go | It really must go. Picking good questions of the FAQ is a far better way to go | ||
:No way. This is not going anywhere. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 08:52, 28 Apr 2004 (EEST) | :No way. This is not going anywhere. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 08:52, 28 Apr 2004 (EEST) | ||
::Fixing it. | |||
Revision as of 01:31, 2 May 2004
This is really really bad. It says nothing specific or concrete. It is full of abstract phrases that mean nothing.
- No. It is very clear terminology for executives and every sentence says something either about how things are in business now or how we hope to change how the business is.
- No, it's bad writing. It's gone.
It really must go. Picking good questions of the FAQ is a far better way to go
- No way. This is not going anywhere. --Juxo 08:52, 28 Apr 2004 (EEST)
- Fixing it.