Claims of corruption: Difference between revisions

    (moving the "no-independent board" claim to FUCOC)
    (moving the "link transit" issue to FUCOC)
    Line 97: Line 97:
    :::This is the FIRST time ANY officer of [[Wikimedia]] has answered them, after DOZENS of attempts to simply censor them.  Your own response is inadequate in many respects, and includes many attempts to [[spin]] things (like labelling as "allegation" the supporting [[fact]]s themselves which no one has disputed).
    :::This is the FIRST time ANY officer of [[Wikimedia]] has answered them, after DOZENS of attempts to simply censor them.  Your own response is inadequate in many respects, and includes many attempts to [[spin]] things (like labelling as "allegation" the supporting [[fact]]s themselves which no one has disputed).


    === recently dealt with ===


    *''Allegation:'' withholding of information regarding [[link transit]] at [[Wikipedia]] which would be very useful to editors, but also quite profitable for a [[search engine]] like Bomis;  several attempts to raise this issue have been suppressed;  in September 2004 [[User:TimStarling]] did some code to start to deal with it.
    ::have no idea of this myself.
    ::since it is the only recent issue listed, I fail to see well how corruption has increased overtime.
    :::Read [[link transit]]


    === individual corruption by officers ===
    === individual corruption by officers ===