User:Jukeboksi/Blog/October2012: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (on the approx 1-day outtage ( apache had some error condition ) some words on implementing open and anonymized voting so that everyone sees what everyone voted for but does not see who voted what)
     
    ('k .. paid the server bills today)
    Line 1: Line 1:
    == 2012-10-02 ==
    'k .. paid the server bills today
    == 2012-10-01 ==
    == 2012-10-01 ==
    There was an outtage of approx. one day in duration that was resolved today. The Apache2 couldn't bind to socket for some reason.
    There was an outtage of approx. one day in duration that was resolved today. The Apache2 couldn't bind to socket for some reason.


    I should really edit [[voting]] to reflect that it really does not make sense from a consumer privacy protection angle to have open personiefied voting, but '''open yet anonymized voting''' in where everyone sees what everyone voted but does not know who voted what ( unless explicitly made public ). This way any paid-trolling and skewing efforts can be countered by formulating anti-skewing vote counting measures and these are easy to distribute should active "trusted" parties/factions form.
    I should really edit [[voting]] to reflect that it really does not make sense from a consumer privacy protection angle to have open personiefied voting, but '''open yet anonymized voting''' in where everyone sees what everyone voted but does not know who voted what ( unless explicitly made public ). This way any paid-trolling and skewing efforts can be countered by formulating anti-skewing vote counting measures and these are easy to distribute should active "trusted" parties/factions form.

    Revision as of 10:44, 2 October 2012

    2012-10-02

    'k .. paid the server bills today

    2012-10-01

    There was an outtage of approx. one day in duration that was resolved today. The Apache2 couldn't bind to socket for some reason.

    I should really edit voting to reflect that it really does not make sense from a consumer privacy protection angle to have open personiefied voting, but open yet anonymized voting in where everyone sees what everyone voted but does not know who voted what ( unless explicitly made public ). This way any paid-trolling and skewing efforts can be countered by formulating anti-skewing vote counting measures and these are easy to distribute should active "trusted" parties/factions form.