From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| Simple is beautiful, natural and good. Or is it some other way around?
| | There's a bomb in scumbag Fraser Anning's office right now. |
|
| |
|
| Philosophy boils down to that if we combine '''information''' about production processes, '''buying power''' and '''compassionate hearts''' then something good will come out of it.
| | By, |
|
| |
|
| Consumerium does not seek to artificially alter the functioning of [[market economy]], lazy as we are, we leave that to the politicians.
| | unclenicolini |
| | |
| Consumerium simply aims to make things more transparent to the [[consumer]] so s/he ''can'' see further and exert '''[[moral purchasing]] power''' with the same $$$ as before. It is up to the consumer to decide what to do with this enhanced view into economic processes and increased power, if anything.
| |
| | |
| [[Product]]s in the common case consist of three things: [[Material]], [[Information]] and [[Energy]]. To merge or forge or transform ''materials'' is actually ''embedding information'' into the ''material'' which takes ''energy'' to do.
| |
| | |
| We would like in particular to avoid [[governance]] problems that arise when we trust our own judgement too much, permit bad examples from elsewhere to be mimicked without justification, allow conflicts of interest, etc.
| |
Revision as of 16:02, 17 March 2019
There's a bomb in scumbag Fraser Anning's office right now.
By,
unclenicolini