Intrashop comparison: Difference between revisions
(moved. changed the begining to reflect changed title from Comparison shop) |
(noting intershop potential and issue, and the only way to prevent it absolutely (license terms and supervision by CGO)) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Some people reject the idea of [[price premium]] and prefer to think in terms of absolutely-acceptable and absolutely-rejected products. This seems unwise as we all have our limits. However, for these people, prices aren't needed, they simply need a more elaborate [[Consumerium buying signal|signal]] that's sufficient to convince them that the better [[price value]] is the worse [[moral value]] or [[local value]]. This will require undoing some [[brand propaganda]] perhaps, a function of the [[Research Wiki]]. | Some people reject the idea of [[price premium]] and prefer to think in terms of absolutely-acceptable and absolutely-rejected products. This seems unwise as we all have our limits. However, for these people, prices aren't needed, they simply need a more elaborate [[Consumerium buying signal|signal]] that's sufficient to convince them that the better [[price value]] is the worse [[moral value]] or [[local value]]. This will require undoing some [[brand propaganda]] perhaps, a function of the [[Research Wiki]]. | ||
There is also '''intershop comparison''' which [[Consumerium Services]] should avoid as it distracts from the main mission, but could be provided by another service that operates on the same [[healthy buying infrastructure]]. Unless it is specifically prohibited by the [[Consumerium License]], this will always be possible, and it might inhibit [[friendly retail]] operations to some degree - so this should be escalated to the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. |