Talk:Wikinfo: Difference between revisions

    (how does this multi-licensing work in practice?)
     
    No edit summary
     
    Line 2: Line 2:


    :How does this work out in practice. I suppose that if an article consists of [[GFDL]]'d and [[CC]] texts it is not applicable to maintain the texts discrete of each other thus resulting in CC texts being subliminated into GFDL, which AFIK is a violation of both [[licenses]]
    :How does this work out in practice. I suppose that if an article consists of [[GFDL]]'d and [[CC]] texts it is not applicable to maintain the texts discrete of each other thus resulting in CC texts being subliminated into GFDL, which AFIK is a violation of both [[licenses]]
    ::Probably true.  But no one knows, because, it's too new.
    ::Also, the GFDL as applied to a [[large public wiki]] is held by some to be almost equivalent to [[public domain]] since there is no way to make a case against [[copyright co-owner]]s, and no practical way to get permission from all involved parties to pursue a case of [[copyright infringement]].  There are many specific critiques of how stupidly [[Wikimedia]] has mismanaged this, go read it on the [[wikilegal]] list which should be called [[stupidsysops]] list.