Talk:Product Group: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (In response to EURONICE as one source of taxonomy ) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
-------- | -------- | ||
Because it's an [[EU standard]], we must meet it. But we need to do a lot of work to figure out all the [[service cycle]]s and [[comprehensive outcome]]s involved. A tomato is not a tomato if one is GMO'd and grown with chemicals far away, and the other grown locally without that. | In response to [[EURONICE]] as one source of taxonomy | ||
:Because it's an [[EU standard]], we must meet it. But we need to do a lot of work to figure out all the [[service cycle]]s and [[comprehensive outcome]]s involved. A tomato is not a tomato if one is GMO'd and grown with chemicals far away, and the other grown locally without that. We might ask [[Slow Food]] for their taxonomy! | |||
Latest revision as of 00:15, 22 March 2004
Is this essentially taxonomy?
- yes it seems like a taxonomy. I'll fix the article to show efforts done on this by other parties. This is required for the following features Intershop navigation, Product substitution, Intrashop navigation
In response to EURONICE as one source of taxonomy
- Because it's an EU standard, we must meet it. But we need to do a lot of work to figure out all the service cycles and comprehensive outcomes involved. A tomato is not a tomato if one is GMO'd and grown with chemicals far away, and the other grown locally without that. We might ask Slow Food for their taxonomy!