Talk:Wiki linking: Difference between revisions
copied here from the article + included words "current practice" to outline that the proposal reverses the current de-facto inter-wiki standard link form |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
''This current practice also violates the proposed [[interwiki link standard]], which would reverse this to [[fr:Wikipedia:Commerce_�quitable]], putting the language first to create a language-specific hierarchy, and requiring the full service name "Wikipedia".'' | ''This current practice also violates the proposed [[interwiki link standard]], which would reverse this to [[fr:Wikipedia:Commerce_�quitable]], putting the language first to create a language-specific hierarchy, and requiring the full service name "Wikipedia".'' | ||
::So make [[en:w:]] and [[fr:w:]] work, and disable the reverse, and we'll try to solve language problems; until then, you are asking us to solve Wikipedia problems, and we refuse | |||
::[[en:gfdl:]] and [[en:neutral:]] would be even better. Then the best GFDL source, or best neutral source, could be determined dynamically by the service, without requiring every author to care, or track the decline of [[Wikipedia]] or the rise of [[Wikinfo]] or [[Metaweb]] or whatever. Really the best GFDL source this week is [[Recyclopedia]] since it has a very recent [[Wikipedia]] dump, and more accurate articles that have no censorship of concepts critical to [[Consumerium]]. | |||