Talk:Link to this page: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(lack of an interwiki standard for categories means its better to rely on links for really fundamental categories) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
But adding such categories is actually messy, and it means paages will be very often in multiple categories. Tags work better than categories for a great many things includingt this I think. | But adding such categories is actually messy, and it means paages will be very often in multiple categories. Tags work better than categories for a great many things includingt this I think. | ||
Also if you shift off [[mediawiki]] your [[categories]] won't necessarily stick, while the links will. For instance to use [[tiddlywiki]] for [[Publish:namespace]] is fine if you did it with links, but not if you did it with categories. | |||
Latest revision as of 19:36, 27 August 2005
It is possible to use categories like:
- defines or challenges the mission of Consumerium:itself
- helps Consumerium itself develop:itself
- helps Consumerium itself research:itself
- helps Consumerium itself publish:itself
But adding such categories is actually messy, and it means paages will be very often in multiple categories. Tags work better than categories for a great many things includingt this I think.
Also if you shift off mediawiki your categories won't necessarily stick, while the links will. For instance to use tiddlywiki for Publish:namespace is fine if you did it with links, but not if you did it with categories.