Talk:False and unsubstantiated claims: Difference between revisions
(moved para from article and answered false statements) |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 09:59, 10 September 2004
Consumerium Services have been pressured to label Wikimedia corruption charges as false and unsubstantiated. Most or all of which of these claims were fully substantiated and documented at one time, but subject to continous vandalism by a clique determed to obscure that very fact. Over time, the influence of such cliques can be toxic and prevent any serious debate about policies.
- Actually to be precise the cases I have moved to FUCOC were either false in the light of yesterdays knowledge or unsubstantiated or simply not corruption by any sensible standards. Anthere was rather dissapointed that you stealthly diluted her responses to the claims you have posted, so it is you who is vandalising the pages that are supposed to present the truth, not just the personal hatered of one troll against a internet project which has succeeded so well that it begins to have political weight. Why can't you admit that not everything you write around here is not true and thus may be proven to be false, a process which is taking up my time which would be better spent on figuring out the practical details needed to launch a Research Wiki pilot --Juxo 12:59, 10 Sep 2004 (EEST)