Consensual point of view: Difference between revisions
(''Opposites:''
) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Similar to [[neutral point of view]] (also [[single point of view]]) but without the claim of objectiveness or absolute truth. | Similar to [[neutral point of view]] (also [[single point of view]]) but without the claim of objectiveness or absolute truth. [[Factionally defined]] terms are allowed but only in the context of explaining that faction's view. | ||
See | Such articles easily splinter into [[multiple point of view]], or are neutered. | ||
''See [[non-neutral point of view]] for various perspectives on this neutering.'' | |||
The '''community point of view''' (with its attendant [[systemic bias]] and authorization of [[sysop vandalism]]) is itself a consensual point of view - where those who are "not part of the community" are held to count for nothing. | |||
''Examples:'' | ''Examples:'' | ||
* C2 (WardsWiki) | * C2 (WardsWiki) | ||
* [[Meta-Wikipedia]] | |||
* [[ | |||
Revision as of 17:14, 2 July 2004
Similar to neutral point of view (also single point of view) but without the claim of objectiveness or absolute truth. Factionally defined terms are allowed but only in the context of explaining that faction's view.
Such articles easily splinter into multiple point of view, or are neutered. See non-neutral point of view for various perspectives on this neutering.
The community point of view (with its attendant systemic bias and authorization of sysop vandalism) is itself a consensual point of view - where those who are "not part of the community" are held to count for nothing.
Examples:
- C2 (WardsWiki)
- Meta-Wikipedia