Unsubstantiated claims of Wikimedia corruption

Evidence of Wikimedia corruption includes:

• false claims added to Wikimedia article here, and true claims removed
• technological escalation against Recyclopedia and threatened against Wikinfo
• no independent board free of influence from Bomis.com
• "Wikimedia Foundation" not consulted when legally important decisions made
• users not consulted when user environment changes
• no actual end user (as opposed to "developer" or "sysop" or "editor") rep on the "board"
• libel chill by Wales
• solicitation of donations beyond Florida state lines
• withholding of information regarding link transit at Wikipedia which would be very useful to editors, but also quite profitable for a search engine like Bomis
• outing and concomitant libel based on echo chamber claims
• sysop vandalism most notably by Auntie Angela
• sysop vigilantiism and more serious developer vigilantiism, notably by Tim Starling and Erik Moeller
• ad hominem delete without process, recently spread to Meta-Wikipedia
• ad hominem revert allowed to stand, including clearly racist ones, e.g. on Islam articles by Zionists, pointing to articles primarily written BY Zionists
• U.S. and U.K. centric editorial policy, set by people who speak only English