Talk:Fair trade: Difference between revisions
(stick to FLO scheme) |
(answers) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides. Stick to labels actually defined by [[FLO]] please. | :You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides. Stick to labels actually defined by [[FLO]] please. | ||
::We are planning to implement these since many products are processed way beyond just [[Cocoa]], [[Sugar]], [[Coffee]], [[Tea]] etc. | |||
--------- | --------- | ||
At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme. | At least [[safe trade]] has a reasonable definition thanks to [[Greenpeace]]. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our [[standard label]] scheme. | ||
:Nope --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:57, 3 May 2004 (EEST) | |||
Revision as of 10:57, 3 May 2004
"Fairly traded is a feature of a product. Partially Fairly Traded is a feature of a product, meaning that some raw-materials or parts of the product are fairly traded. (eg. In restaurant meals) Partially Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that some part of the company's business deals with fairly traded products. Fully Fair Trading is a feature of a company, meaning that the company deals only in fairly traded goods."
- You can't seriously tell us that these labels are used by anybody?!?? We can't make them up ourselves, as they are meaningless, and bad grammar besides. Stick to labels actually defined by FLO please.
At least safe trade has a reasonable definition thanks to Greenpeace. If fair trade is defined so badly, perhaps we should just forget about it in our standard label scheme.
- Nope --Juxo 13:57, 3 May 2004 (EEST)