Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
(points to address before changing this again) |
(anwsers to 142.177.X.X) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
1. how, exactly, is one to prevent [[intershop comparison]] from being provided by an add-on service? What [[Consumerium License]] provisions specifically say "you can't do this, and we can yank your access to the data if you do"? | 1. how, exactly, is one to prevent [[intershop comparison]] from being provided by an add-on service? What [[Consumerium License]] provisions specifically say "you can't do this, and we can yank your access to the data if you do"? | ||
:<pre>Including explicit price data in your submissions is explicitly forbidden in [[Consumerium]]. | |||
Any such data will be removed if found in [[Research Wiki]] or [[Signal Wiki]] | |||
You may include verbal descriptions of pricing policies of different companies, | |||
but no numerical data whether as in price or percentage will be allowed</pre> --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 16:59, 13 Mar 2004 (EET) | |||
2. why, exactly, does the [[Development Wiki]]'s present concept of [[Features]] and their priority take precedence over what is required to implement [[best cases]]? A proper development process is motivated by its [[comprehensive outcome]] as expressed in [[use case]]s. | 2. why, exactly, does the [[Development Wiki]]'s present concept of [[Features]] and their priority take precedence over what is required to implement [[best cases]]? A proper development process is motivated by its [[comprehensive outcome]] as expressed in [[use case]]s. | ||
:I haven't looked at the [[best cases]] in a while and when i did i found them to be quite [[utopia]]n (exept for those that were [[dystopia]]n) and to the anwser as to why there will be no explicit price data is to | |||
::A) No retailer, not even [[friendly retail]]er will want their price information to be licensed for any use that is not explicitly hoped and paid for by the retailer ie. [[advertising]] | |||
::B) Including price data within the [[Wikis]] would gepardise our assumed neutrality. | |||
::C) Keeping the price data exact and up-to-date would take too much resources | |||
3. If you have big problems or anticipate big problems with [[intershop comparison]], why is there nothing in [[worst cases]] explaining how it has bad consequences? Until there is, objections to this feature HAVE NO STATUS, and amount to nothing but feelings. This is similar to the [[betting]] issue. If you can't explain why it's bad, expect others to pursue it, until you can. If you're building an open architecture, you're going to see services you don't want implemented, implemented. | 3. If you have big problems or anticipate big problems with [[intershop comparison]], why is there nothing in [[worst cases]] explaining how it has bad consequences? Until there is, objections to this feature HAVE NO STATUS, and amount to nothing but feelings. This is similar to the [[betting]] issue. If you can't explain why it's bad, expect others to pursue it, until you can. If you're building an open architecture, you're going to see services you don't want implemented, implemented. | ||
:We are likely to run into possibly bad attitudes in implementing [[Intershop navigation]], since some retailers will be afraid that the feature is driving customers to competing businesses. besides if you look at [[features]] it says that the implementation medium for [[Intershop navigation]] is yet undetermined since it requires some kind of [[GIS]]-engine to run such a service, which undoubtably would be useful. | |||
4. Consider whether your view is [[faction]]al. To many people, price comparison is the first feature they'd want, and only later would they care about [[moral purchasing]]. | 4. Consider whether your view is [[faction]]al. To many people, price comparison is the first feature they'd want, and only later would they care about [[moral purchasing]]. | ||
:The ones looking primarily for price comparison can go elsewhere. The internet is full of [[price comparison]]-services |