Talk:E-waste: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:49, 10 March 2004

Time to review the so-called hardware requirements and see if they are actually e-waste creation non-requirements.

I view the hardware requirements as something that by market dynamics will be implemented because of demand for such versatile techonologies as Bluetooth for example. NFC is another thing that will in my guess be wildly popular within a few years if the mobile phone manufacturers decide to go that way. I guess i should contact the major vendors for inquiring about their intentions regarding NFC because for Consumerium:Usability it would be great feature on mobile terminals. It is not controversial and potentially dangerous as RFID is seen by many.

Revision as of 03:43, 10 March 2004 (edit) 142.177.76.153 (talk) No edit summary		Revision as of 11:49, 10 March 2004 (edit) (undo) Jukeboksi (talk \| contribs) (anwser) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Time to review the so-called [[hardware requirements]] and see if they are actually [[e-waste]] creation non-requirements.		Time to review the so-called [[hardware requirements]] and see if they are actually [[e-waste]] creation non-requirements.

			:I view the hardware requirements as something that by market dynamics will be implemented because of demand for such versatile techonologies as [[Bluetooth]] for example. [[NFC]] is another thing that will in my guess be wildly popular within a few years if the mobile phone manufacturers decide to go that way. I guess i should contact the major vendors for inquiring about their intentions regarding [[NFC]] because for [[Consumerium:Usability]] it would be great feature on mobile terminals. It is not controversial and potentially dangerous as [[RFID]] is seen by many.