Talk:Link to this page: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 19:36, 27 August 2005

It is possible to use categories like:

defines or challenges the mission of Consumerium:itself
helps Consumerium itself develop:itself
helps Consumerium itself research:itself
helps Consumerium itself publish:itself

But adding such categories is actually messy, and it means paages will be very often in multiple categories. Tags work better than categories for a great many things includingt this I think.

Also if you shift off mediawiki your categories won't necessarily stick, while the links will. For instance to use tiddlywiki for Publish:namespace is fine if you did it with links, but not if you did it with categories.

Revision as of 19:35, 27 August 2005 edit 142.177.82.215 (talk) No edit summary		Latest revision as of 19:36, 27 August 2005 edit undo 142.177.82.215 (talk) lack of an interwiki standard for categories means its better to rely on links for really fundamental categories
Line 7:		Line 7:

	But adding such categories is actually messy, and it means paages will be very often in multiple categories. Tags work better than categories for a great many things includingt this I think.		But adding such categories is actually messy, and it means paages will be very often in multiple categories. Tags work better than categories for a great many things includingt this I think.

			Also if you shift off [[mediawiki]] your [[categories]] won't necessarily stick, while the links will. For instance to use [[tiddlywiki]] for [[Publish:namespace]] is fine if you did it with links, but not if you did it with categories.