Alternate wiki-implementations: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    m (tyop)
    No edit summary
    Line 1: Line 1:
    Currently 3 out of 20 of our registered users are registered [[MediaWiki]] developers, which makes our percentage of developers among users '''15%''', which is likely the highest figure any public MediaWiki installation can boost so that is an good incentative to try to adapt MediaWiki for our use over other wikis
    Currently 3 out of 20 of our registered users are registered [[MediaWiki]] developers, which makes our percentage of developers among users '''15%''', which is likely the highest figure any public MediaWiki installation can boost so that is an good incentive to try to adapt MediaWiki for our use over other wikis
    ----
    ----
    <table>
    <table>
    Line 6: Line 6:
    </tr>
    </tr>
    <td>
    <td>
    *Proven to perform well under heavy load
    *Proven to perform well under heavy load - but with hard limits
    *Interaction between other systems the same software is needed
    *Most likely basis for [[wikitext standard]]
    *Worked good for R&D purposes
    *Working now for R&D purposes
    *Dedicated developer community
    *Dedicated developer community which also mostly develops content
    *Readable documentation, thanks to the above
    *A very high ratio of developers (15% of registered users) registered in [[consumerium]]
    *A very high ratio of developers (15% of registered users) registered in [[consumerium]]
    *supports SQL only
    </td>
    </td>
    <td>
    <td>
    Line 16: Line 18:
    *Visualization of wiki-links
    *Visualization of wiki-links
    *Polls built in
    *Polls built in
    *Many developers doing lots of detail work on CM and CMS
    *supports ALL databases not just MySQL
    </td>
    </td>
    <td>
    <td>
    *Good parser
    *Good parser
    *???
    *Python language
    *excellent architecture making extensibility very simple
    *[[troll]] in the logo
    *no need for SQL
    </td>
    </td>
    </tr>
    </tr>
    </table>
    </table>
    Others include [[VeryQuickWiki]] (a [[Java wiki]]), [[UseMod]] (only advantage is that it dumps [[XML output]], very very very important until there is a real [[wikitext standard]]).


    ----
    ----

    Revision as of 23:39, 6 November 2003

    Currently 3 out of 20 of our registered users are registered MediaWiki developers, which makes our percentage of developers among users 15%, which is likely the highest figure any public MediaWiki installation can boost so that is an good incentive to try to adapt MediaWiki for our use over other wikis


    MediaWikiTikiWikiMoinMoin
    • Proven to perform well under heavy load - but with hard limits
    • Most likely basis for wikitext standard
    • Working now for R&D purposes
    • Dedicated developer community which also mostly develops content
    • Readable documentation, thanks to the above
    • A very high ratio of developers (15% of registered users) registered in consumerium
    • supports SQL only
    • Group management built-in
    • Visualization of wiki-links
    • Polls built in
    • Many developers doing lots of detail work on CM and CMS
    • supports ALL databases not just MySQL
    • Good parser
    • Python language
    • excellent architecture making extensibility very simple
    • troll in the logo
    • no need for SQL

    Others include VeryQuickWiki (a Java wiki), UseMod (only advantage is that it dumps XML output, very very very important until there is a real wikitext standard).


    See also: