Talk:Scienterrific method: Difference between revisions

    From Consumerium development wiki R&D Wiki
    (lol at w:Cargo Cult )
     
    (another cargo cult)
     
    Line 1: Line 1:
    lol at [[w:Cargo Cult]]
    lol at [[w:Cargo Cult]]
    :Yes and apparently there also are [[Wikipedia|cargo cult encyclopedist]]s who think that a pile of [[sysop vandalism|ordinary people doing damage to articles they do not understand]] with no [[independent board|proper guidance with legitimate moral values]] constitutes a substitute for [[Britannica]] or [[Encarta]].  Like [[w:cargo cult science|science]] or [[w:cargo cult programming|programming]] it seems form outstrips function in many groups.

    Latest revision as of 18:09, 22 August 2004

    lol at w:Cargo Cult

    Yes and apparently there also are cargo cult encyclopedists who think that a pile of ordinary people doing damage to articles they do not understand with no proper guidance with legitimate moral values constitutes a substitute for Britannica or Encarta. Like science or programming it seems form outstrips function in many groups.