Basis for unity: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
(rm MediaWiki bashing) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A '''basis for unity''' is a common [[declaration of bias]] of many people trying to achieve '''unity''' on some cause or range of causes. Without it a [[systemic bias]] tends to develop instead, often with unwanted agreements that only empower a [[clique]] or [[power structure]] that is relied on, e.g. leading to [[technology as slavery]] if one over-relies on one technology | A '''basis for unity''' is a common [[declaration of bias]] of many people trying to achieve '''unity''' on some cause or range of causes. Without it a [[systemic bias]] tends to develop instead, often with unwanted agreements that only empower a [[clique]] or [[power structure]] that is relied on, e.g. leading to [[technology as slavery]] if one over-relies on one technology. | ||
[[Consumerium Governance Organization]] must manage the '''basis for unity''' of all users of [[Consumerium Services]] and encourage [[faction]]s to develop their own [[factionally defined]] basis when they disagree very strongly with others. Thus even if overall unity is impossible right now, more fragmented [[democracy]] remains possible. | [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] must manage the '''basis for unity''' of all users of [[Consumerium Services]] and encourage [[faction]]s to develop their own [[factionally defined]] basis when they disagree very strongly with others. Thus even if overall unity is impossible right now, more fragmented [[democracy]] remains possible. | ||
Latest revision as of 12:32, 19 August 2004
A basis for unity is a common declaration of bias of many people trying to achieve unity on some cause or range of causes. Without it a systemic bias tends to develop instead, often with unwanted agreements that only empower a clique or power structure that is relied on, e.g. leading to technology as slavery if one over-relies on one technology.
Consumerium Governance Organization must manage the basis for unity of all users of Consumerium Services and encourage factions to develop their own factionally defined basis when they disagree very strongly with others. Thus even if overall unity is impossible right now, more fragmented democracy remains possible.