Talk:Faction tag: Difference between revisions
(interesting idea) |
(factional talk from #Wikipedia) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Interesting idea. This could be done by using [[w:Wikipedia:Template messages]] --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 12:33, 14 Jul 2004 (EEST) but the real question once again is that who wants to take on the burden of power of flagging some article [[approved]]/[[disapproved]]/[[should not exist]] on behalf of a faction and how will those persons be chosen or is there even a need to determine who can and who can't do such things on behalf of some [[faction]]. | |||
Once again we run into the age-old problem of requiring a [[power structure]] without wanting one because all new power structures are always based on earlier power structures finally leading to people flaming the [[Lowest Troll]] to be a Despot, Dictator, Fascist, [[Sysop]] or [[GodKing]] with [[God's Eye View]]. | |||
-------- | |||
''This stuff from [[Meta-Wikipedia]]'s list of IRC quotes seems relevant to the question of tagging for [[faction]]:'' | |||
: | <juxho> here are the basic assumptions i'm relying on: there | ||
will be [[opinion wiki]] where strict syntax will be | |||
required to get aggregate information to [[publish wiki]], | |||
non-neutral-pov is the rule. there will be research | |||
wiki where all non-neutral-pov stuff will get axed | |||
immediatelly with a kind notice to go mess around in the | |||
[[opinion wiki]]. [[publish wiki]] will import from | |||
[[research wiki]] pending that someone will bet their own | |||
credibility in declaring some information so certain that | |||
it needs to be published. also aggregated (via SQL scripts | |||
written in a not-yet-decided language) will be used to | |||
automatically update the articles in [[publish wiki]] with | |||
the aggregate information from [[opinion wiki]] with | |||
highlights and links to the whole mess of opinions | |||
* juxho gone to drink more beer | |||
% | |||
<nsh> I'm currently putting off over 200 individually important tasks | |||
<Grunt`> nsh: how many of them involve putting off work? ;) | |||
<nsh> Grunt`, most of them, but that's the beauty of it | |||
% | |||
<clarknova> water isn't cheap at all. it comes at a tremendous | |||
hidden cost. | |||
<Raul654> It falls from the sky, for free! | |||
% | |||
* Kurt__ goes back to planning his capitalist revolution | |||
* blankfaze goes back to planning his libertarian revolution | |||
* iostream goes back to planning his opensource revolution | |||
* Grunt` goes back to planning his revolution revolution | |||
* morwen goes back to planning her punk rock revolution | |||
* AdamBishop goes back to revolving around the sun | |||
----------- | |||
How sad that [[Juxo]] discusses this stuff with the [[groupthink]]ers, but not here first!!! Why not ask intelligent people from all these factions over here? | |||
Latest revision as of 18:38, 24 July 2004
Interesting idea. This could be done by using w:Wikipedia:Template messages --Juxo 12:33, 14 Jul 2004 (EEST) but the real question once again is that who wants to take on the burden of power of flagging some article approved/disapproved/should not exist on behalf of a faction and how will those persons be chosen or is there even a need to determine who can and who can't do such things on behalf of some faction.
Once again we run into the age-old problem of requiring a power structure without wanting one because all new power structures are always based on earlier power structures finally leading to people flaming the Lowest Troll to be a Despot, Dictator, Fascist, Sysop or GodKing with God's Eye View.
This stuff from Meta-Wikipedia's list of IRC quotes seems relevant to the question of tagging for faction:
<juxho> here are the basic assumptions i'm relying on: there
will be opinion wiki where strict syntax will be required to get aggregate information to publish wiki, non-neutral-pov is the rule. there will be research wiki where all non-neutral-pov stuff will get axed immediatelly with a kind notice to go mess around in the opinion wiki. publish wiki will import from research wiki pending that someone will bet their own credibility in declaring some information so certain that it needs to be published. also aggregated (via SQL scripts written in a not-yet-decided language) will be used to automatically update the articles in publish wiki with the aggregate information from opinion wiki with highlights and links to the whole mess of opinions * juxho gone to drink more beer
%
<nsh> I'm currently putting off over 200 individually important tasks
<Grunt`> nsh: how many of them involve putting off work? ;)
<nsh> Grunt`, most of them, but that's the beauty of it
% <clarknova> water isn't cheap at all. it comes at a tremendous
hidden cost. <Raul654> It falls from the sky, for free!
%
- Kurt__ goes back to planning his capitalist revolution
- blankfaze goes back to planning his libertarian revolution
- iostream goes back to planning his opensource revolution
- Grunt` goes back to planning his revolution revolution
- morwen goes back to planning her punk rock revolution
- AdamBishop goes back to revolving around the sun
How sad that Juxo discusses this stuff with the groupthinkers, but not here first!!! Why not ask intelligent people from all these factions over here?