Intrashop comparison: Difference between revisions
noting intershop potential and issue, and the only way to prevent it absolutely (license terms and supervision by CGO)
(moved. changed the begining to reflect changed title from Comparison shop) |
(noting intershop potential and issue, and the only way to prevent it absolutely (license terms and supervision by CGO)) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Some people reject the idea of [[price premium]] and prefer to think in terms of absolutely-acceptable and absolutely-rejected products. This seems unwise as we all have our limits. However, for these people, prices aren't needed, they simply need a more elaborate [[Consumerium buying signal|signal]] that's sufficient to convince them that the better [[price value]] is the worse [[moral value]] or [[local value]]. This will require undoing some [[brand propaganda]] perhaps, a function of the [[Research Wiki]]. | Some people reject the idea of [[price premium]] and prefer to think in terms of absolutely-acceptable and absolutely-rejected products. This seems unwise as we all have our limits. However, for these people, prices aren't needed, they simply need a more elaborate [[Consumerium buying signal|signal]] that's sufficient to convince them that the better [[price value]] is the worse [[moral value]] or [[local value]]. This will require undoing some [[brand propaganda]] perhaps, a function of the [[Research Wiki]]. | ||
There is also '''intershop comparison''' which [[Consumerium Services]] should avoid as it distracts from the main mission, but could be provided by another service that operates on the same [[healthy buying infrastructure]]. Unless it is specifically prohibited by the [[Consumerium License]], this will always be possible, and it might inhibit [[friendly retail]] operations to some degree - so this should be escalated to the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. | |||