Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
User:Jukeboksi/Thinking aloud: Difference between revisions
fixing silly names
(One or Two wikis?) |
(fixing silly names) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''This is just thinking aloud, so there are bound to be lots of errors and nonsense''' | '''This is just thinking aloud, so there are bound to be lots of errors and nonsense''' | ||
There has been some complaints about [[The Consumerium Exchange]] being a misleading name for the facility, which is about '''experessing opinions and support or the lack of for the expressed opinions''' and I have noted this problem that it does not translate well at all, so I propose a new working title: '''[[ | There has been some complaints about [[The Consumerium Exchange]] being a misleading name for the facility, which is about '''experessing opinions and support or the lack of for the expressed opinions''' and I have noted this problem that it does not translate well at all, so I propose a new working title: '''[[Opinion Wiki]]''' . This name is in no way "set in stone" due to that this wiki has arrived at a state of incoherence in other words this is a mess and it's largely due to that we started out without any clue on naming conventions or when to write stuff in one article and when to split it to many articles. | ||
---- | ---- | ||
As mentioned in [[Campaign#Campaign Management|Campaign]] there is an initial thought of campaign management by wiki which would be easy for the campaigners. | As mentioned in [[Campaign#Campaign Management|Campaign]] there is an initial thought of campaign management by wiki which would be easy for the campaigners. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Thinking about this approach I came to the realisation that why not extend the use of wiki beyond just campaign management so that majority of the user interface to The Consumerium Exchange would be wiki based. | Thinking about this approach I came to the realisation that why not extend the use of wiki beyond just campaign management so that majority of the user interface to The Consumerium Exchange would be wiki based. | ||
==Basic Outline of | ==Basic Outline of Opinion Wiki== | ||
Here goes an initial outline of how it would work: | Here goes an initial outline of how it would work: | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
**WikiGroupName/OurVotes | **WikiGroupName/OurVotes | ||
==More on | ==More on Opinion Wiki== | ||
*From these bits of information directed, weighed networks describing distribution of WikiVotes and Campaigners can be formed and the directed networks will be used to calculate indices that can be studied | *From these bits of information directed, weighed networks describing distribution of WikiVotes and Campaigners can be formed and the directed networks will be used to calculate indices that can be studied | ||
| Line 67: | Line 67: | ||
*This is in no way complete and there is likely a lot of opportunities for new kinds of vandalism | *This is in no way complete and there is likely a lot of opportunities for new kinds of vandalism | ||
Note that there could be multiple levels of (un)security available for committing changes to | Note that there could be multiple levels of (un)security available for committing changes to Opinion Wiki: | ||
#Anonymous access | #Anonymous access | ||
| Line 81: | Line 81: | ||
==One or Two wikis?== | ==One or Two wikis?== | ||
Suppose two wikis, I'll call them [[ | Suppose two wikis, I'll call them [[Opinion Wiki]] and [[Content Wiki]] as working titles. | ||
This has advantages: | This has advantages: | ||
*Better scalability | *Better scalability | ||
*Better security (HTTPS?) for | *Better security (HTTPS?) for Opinion Wiki without performance losses in Content Wiki | ||
*Differentiated sysops | *Differentiated sysops | ||
*What else is there | *What else is there | ||