Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,867
edits
User:Jukeboksi/Thinking aloud: Difference between revisions
One or Two wikis?
(on vandalism, VirtualGroup management and general security issues) |
(One or Two wikis?) |
||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
#Access protected by GnuPG signatures on save with keys verified by a third party or Consumerium Vault | #Access protected by GnuPG signatures on save with keys verified by a third party or Consumerium Vault | ||
#Access protected by GnuPG signatures on save with keys verified by third parties and Consumerium Vault | #Access protected by GnuPG signatures on save with keys verified by third parties and Consumerium Vault | ||
---- | |||
And on... | |||
==One or Two wikis?== | |||
Suppose two wikis, I'll call them [[Wikinion]] and [[Wikitent]] as working titles for WIKI for expressing opiNIONs and WIKI for conTENT. And I know, totally silly names, but for the time being. | |||
This has advantages: | |||
*Better scalability | |||
*Better security (HTTPS?) for Wikinion without performance losses in Wikitent | |||
*Differentiated sysops | |||
*What else is there | |||
and disadvantages: | |||
*Distinct Recent Changes (could be hacked to show both in one view) | |||
*Double login (can maybe be avoided by sharing the session) | |||
*Checking link correctness is more work (could be hacked too) | |||
*Differentiated sysops | |||
*What else is there | |||
I hear that [http://openfacts.berlios.de/index-en.phtml?title=Main_Page OpenFacts] have done something like session sharing with multiple wikis with MediaWiki. Must inquire them about their solution and experiences | |||