Talk:Overnet: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:Is [[bittorrent]] better? | :Is [[bittorrent]] better? | ||
:Is there any way to use a [[peer to peer network]] of any kind to carry any controversial traffic say to the [[Consumerium buying signal]]? If we could do [[Distributed Consumerium]] starting with the [[Publish Wiki]], then we could avoid ANY [[liability]] accruing to the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] and all [[healthy buying infrastructure]] comments would be from [[faction]]s. | :Is there any way to use a [[peer to peer network]] of any kind to carry any controversial traffic say to the [[Consumerium buying signal]]? If we could do [[Distributed Consumerium]] starting with the [[Publish Wiki]], then we could avoid ANY [[liability]] accruing to the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] and all [[healthy buying infrastructure]] comments would be from [[faction]]s "that we have no control over, sorry" when the lawyers come to call with [[libel chill]] [[lawsuit]]s. | ||
Latest revision as of 19:31, 24 July 2004
Overnet seems like one of these internet services that "are not tapped" because the protocol refuses such, but having no control over the underlying infrastructure and protocol levels is very much subject to all sorts of things which are "impossible".
- Is bittorrent better?
- Is there any way to use a peer to peer network of any kind to carry any controversial traffic say to the Consumerium buying signal? If we could do Distributed Consumerium starting with the Publish Wiki, then we could avoid ANY liability accruing to the Consumerium Governance Organization and all healthy buying infrastructure comments would be from factions "that we have no control over, sorry" when the lawyers come to call with libel chill lawsuits.