Talk:Simple English: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
(seems reasonable)
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Seems reasonable. The English articles will make up the backbone of information to which all other language versions will be compared to so it is a sound policy to try to use language that can be understood bo as many people as possible [[User:Juxo|Juxo]]
Seems reasonable. The English articles will make up the backbone of information to which all other language versions will be compared to so it is a sound policy to try to use language that can be understood bo as many people as possible [[User:Juxo|Juxo]]
:Right, so if you have an issue with the definition of [[time horizon]] here, as you raised in [[talk:time horizon]], you must take it to [http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/time_horizon] - where a lot more people can and should argue with you over it - and only when you are satisfied that *that* definition is correct, should you fix the much shorter one here.  This is a bit of a pain but it drastically reduces the risk of our relying on any unchecked or nonstandard definition of terms that will matter a ''lot'' when we are doing this in 40 languages....
Anonymous user