Consumerium talk:Philosophy: Difference between revisions
transparency, reflexivity, both critical, and need to be mentioned in the "philosophy"
(i think we are making assumptions offhandedly all the time) |
(transparency, reflexivity, both critical, and need to be mentioned in the "philosophy") |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The only assumption we make, is to make no assumptions that we aren't forced to make. | The only assumption we make, is to make no assumptions that we aren't forced to make. | ||
:Actually this is not true, at least for me, i've been making assumptions about many things sometimes failing to anticipate the future development sometimes hitting bulls eye and sometimes i'm just not informed. One example is the I figured there were no services similar to [[Consumerium:Itself]] before I discovered many [[Product registries]] exist already. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:11, 14 Mar 2004 (EET) | :Actually this is not true, at least for me, i've been making assumptions about many things sometimes failing to anticipate the future development sometimes hitting bulls eye and sometimes i'm just not informed. One example is the I figured there were no services similar to [[Consumerium:Itself]] before I discovered many [[Product registries]] exist already. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:11, 14 Mar 2004 (EET) | ||
-------- | |||
Both of the above points need to be made somehow in the article. If one has no link to [[Transparent Consumerium]] then it isn't clear that [[w:transparency]] is really part of the philosophy. If there's no link to [[Consumerium:Itself]] then it isn't clear that reflexivity is part of the philosophy. And I think in both cases, they are. These are both important [[troll-friendly]] concepts too but you don't have to put that in the philosophy. ;-0 Trolls eat philosophy. Yum yum. | |||
Look at [http://recyclopedia.info/wiki/wiki.phtml?title=Recyclopedia:policy en: Recyclopedia:policy]. It's about the simplest reflexivity statement possible. | |||