Consumerium talk:Rules: Difference between revisions
How much more democratic can it get?
Wittgenstein (talk | contribs) (on colors, trolls and factions) |
(How much more democratic can it get?) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Having their own faction that has no color thus it is not viewable to human eyes renders them transparent giving them superiour stealth for doing many kinds of power grabbing. They (the trolls) may be useful in some ways for us to reach our stated goal of enabling [[political consumerism]] but I must strongly suggest that they cease to demand that [[faction]]s be associated with colors while they insist on remaining without color. If they do not do this peacefully a [[sysop power structure]] will have to be formed to see to that this outrageous inbalance of this theatre is eradicated. --[[User:Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein]] 20:25, 23 Jul 2004 (EEST) | Having their own faction that has no color thus it is not viewable to human eyes renders them transparent giving them superiour stealth for doing many kinds of power grabbing. They (the trolls) may be useful in some ways for us to reach our stated goal of enabling [[political consumerism]] but I must strongly suggest that they cease to demand that [[faction]]s be associated with colors while they insist on remaining without color. If they do not do this peacefully a [[sysop power structure]] will have to be formed to see to that this outrageous inbalance of this theatre is eradicated. --[[User:Wittgenstein|Wittgenstein]] 20:25, 23 Jul 2004 (EEST) | ||
:yeay. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 00:05, 24 Jul 2004 (EEST) | |||
::[[trolls]] choose [[black]] as the anarchist colour, and for the security of the dark. | |||
::and we agree it is theatre. | |||
::but what "power grabbing"? We have no [[technological escalation]] ability: no [[bot]], no [[IP block]]. Everything [[trolls]] do must be by persuasion. How much more democratic can it get? | |||