Bureaucrats, developer, Administrators
9,854
edits
(added notes about the relationship of ConsuML and Wiki information) |
(Subarticles vs. monolith articles) |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
===How to handle the internationalization?=== | ===How to handle the internationalization?=== | ||
Should all language versions strive to contain the same information or how should we go about this? | Should all language versions strive to contain the same information or how should we go about this? | ||
===Subarticles or a single article?=== | |||
There are good sides to both approaches. When thinking about companies an outline of multiple articles might be something like | |||
* [[Company X]] - containing basic identification, [[product group]]s, [[brand]]s, [[product]]s etc. | |||
* [[Company X/economy]] | |||
* [[Company X/history]] | |||
* [[Company X/affiliated businesses]] | |||
* [[Company X/executives]] | |||
* [[Company X/advertising]] | |||
* [[Company X/labor practices]] | |||
If the document structure is standaridised it makes for easier navigation and faster downloads. On the other hand it might be considered to limit the creativity of the editors |