Cium: Difference between revisions
m formatting |
keep both, it's only US$10/year each |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:--[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:38 Apr 14, 2003 (EEST) | :--[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 13:38 Apr 14, 2003 (EEST) | ||
pros: | |||
:+ pronounced "Key 'em" suggests [[certification]] and [[geospatial reference]] (as in map key), "See 'em" suggests [[transparency]] and [[accountability]] | |||
:+ "insiders Key 'em so outsiders can See 'em" - memorable logo | |||
cons: | |||
:- name itself is not as memorable as Consumerium. Keep both? Cium as the service, run by Consumerium Foundation? | |||
:- "Consumerium" stoody nicely for "Consumer [[Consortium]]" - a union of consumers with common standards. | |||
Latest revision as of 01:03, 17 May 2003
This is my proposition for a better name for the project (takes effect if ppl support it and I get my next salary so I can purchase the domain)
pros:
- + It's easier to type and remember
- + It's easier to pronounce
- + It's phonetic association in English is good
- + it's a shorthand for "Consum***** Information Unified Model" (choose any word starting with C if you like)
- --Juxo 13:38 Apr 14, 2003 (EEST)
pros:
- + pronounced "Key 'em" suggests certification and geospatial reference (as in map key), "See 'em" suggests transparency and accountability
- + "insiders Key 'em so outsiders can See 'em" - memorable logo
cons:
- - name itself is not as memorable as Consumerium. Keep both? Cium as the service, run by Consumerium Foundation?
- - "Consumerium" stoody nicely for "Consumer Consortium" - a union of consumers with common standards.