142.177.X.X/Embarking on a wiki witchhunt: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:17, 29 August 2005

Some English Wikipedia User reportedly performed vandalism against

"Reportedly"? Who reports this? You are the only person to report this. Have you become a news agency instead of an troll? --Juxo 11:17, 29 Aug 2005 (GMT)

Consumerium under the name User:Juxhomosexual, a name that seems to deliberately attempt to insult or smear our beloved Lowest Troll:

Yeah yeah, big deal

~~sniplet of RC log removed as containing no information of any use and bad googlebait~~

Some English Wikipedia User is a known sysop vandal who deliberately restores lies and libel in Wikipedia's pages, and will block IP of those who object or point out that the behaviour is illegal and creates legal liability for Wikimedia. --Juxo 11:17, 29 Aug 2005 (GMT)

The user you are blaming for the recent vandalism lives in the east coast of US and If you would have bothered to trace the IP:s (see Special:Logs block log for the IPs used by the vandal) the vandal is approximatelly in L.A. Ok, in the strict sense this does not prove anything, the machine in L.A. could be a drone that has malware installed that allows the TCP/IP traffic to be relayed so that it appears to originate from that machine etc. etc. --Juxo 11:17, 29 Aug 2005 (GMT)

You are engaging on a Wiki witchhunt and imposing Alleged and collective identity without any proof at all. Where is your integrity!? You wrote those articles and now it seems that anything anyone else does is bad and you can do what ever you please without sticking to avoiding the practices you judge or deem as bad practices. Have some sense will you.

This occurred just before (like minutes before) the attack on Consumerium itself. This is not ethical trolling, because it involves using administrator powers to propagate falsehoods.

Realizing that they had accidently set the Juxhomosexual user pages to redirect to their Wikipedia identity, they covered their tracks by changing the redirect.

No they didn't. I can see the deletion logs and no such change was ever made. Get your facts straigth. I just deleted the user and talk page and banned the user for 3 years

And writing "covered their tracks by changing the redirect" (in a MediaWiki) is either or all of:

) Completely ignorant
) Stupid
) Plain non-sense

--Juxo 11:17, 29 Aug 2005 (GMT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-'''Some English Wikipedia User''' reportedly performed [[vandalism]] against [[Consumerium]] under the name [[User:Juxhomosexual]], a name that seems to deliberately attempt to insult or smear our beloved [[Lowest Troll]]:
+'''Some English Wikipedia User''' reportedly performed [[vandalism]] against
-    * (diff) (hist) . . N User talk:142.177.114.122; 23:17 . . Juxhomosexual (Talk)
+:"Reportedly"? Who reports this? You are the only person to report this. Have you become a news agency instead of an troll? --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 11:17, 29 Aug 2005 (GMT)
-    * (diff) (hist) . . User talk:142.177.82.215; 23:17 . . Juxhomosexual (Talk)
-    * (diff) (hist) . . User:Juxo; 23:16 . . Juxhomosexual (Talk)
-    * (diff) (hist) . . N User talk:Juxhomosexual; 23:14 . . Juxhomosexual (Talk)
-    * (diff) (hist) . . User:Juxhomosexual; 23:14 . . Juxhomosexual (Talk)
-    * (diff) (hist) . . N User:Juxhomosexual; 23:14 . . Juxhomosexual (Talk)
-    * (diff) (hist) . . User talk:Juxo; 23:13 . . Juxhomosexual (Talk)
-Some English Wikipedia User is a known [[sysop vandal]] who deliberately restores lies and libel in [[Wikipedia]]'s pages, and will [[block IP]] of those who object or point out that the behaviour is illegal and creates legal liability for [[Wikimedia]].  This occurred just before (like minutes before) the attack on [[Consumerium itself]].  This is not [[ethical troll]]ing, because it involves using [[administrator]] powers to propagate falsehoods.
+[[Consumerium]] under the name [[User:Juxhomosexual]], a name that seems to deliberately attempt to insult or smear our beloved [[Lowest Troll]]:
+:Yeah yeah, big deal
+:<strike>sniplet of RC log removed as containing no information of any use and bad googlebait</strike>
+Some English Wikipedia User is a known [[sysop vandal]] who deliberately restores lies and libel in [[Wikipedia]]'s pages, and will [[block IP]] of those who object or point out that the behaviour is illegal and creates legal liability for [[Wikimedia]].  --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 11:17, 29 Aug 2005 (GMT)
+:The user you are blaming for the recent [[vandalism]] lives in the '''east coast''' of US and If you would have bothered to trace the IP:s (see [[Special:Logs]] block log for the IPs used by the vandal) the vandal is approximatelly in L.A. Ok, in the strict sense this does not prove anything, the machine in L.A. could be a drone that has malware installed that allows the TCP/IP traffic to be relayed so that it appears to originate from that machine etc. etc. --[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 11:17, 29 Aug 2005 (GMT)
+:You are engaging on a [[Wiki witchhunt]] and imposing [[Alleged and collective identity]] without any proof at all. '''Where is your integrity!?''' You wrote those articles and now it seems that anything anyone else does is bad and you can do what ever you please without sticking to avoiding the practices you judge or deem as bad practices. Have some sense will you.
+This occurred just before (like minutes before) the attack on [[Consumerium itself]].  This is not [[ethical troll]]ing, because it involves using [[administrator]] powers to propagate falsehoods.
 Realizing that they had accidently set the Juxhomosexual user pages to redirect to their Wikipedia identity, they covered their tracks by changing the redirect.
+:No they didn't. I can see the deletion logs and no such change was ever made. Get your facts straigth. I just deleted the user and talk page and banned the user for 3 years
+:And writing "covered their tracks by changing the redirect" (in a [[MediaWiki]]) is either or all of:
+#) Completely ignorant
+#) Stupid
+#) Plain non-sense
+--[[User:Juxo|Juxo]] 11:17, 29 Aug 2005 (GMT)