Search results

'''[[MediaWiki developer]] payment''' has been proposed by [[Erik Moeller]][http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Developer_payment and resisted by some oth

...chamber]] lies. One such '''troll jihad''' declaration was against [[Erik Moeller]], who often attempts [[outing]], and has advocated [[developer vigilantiis : ROTFL. You are entertaining in a truly pathetic way, Craig.--Erik

...ssion about [[Gus Kouwenhoven]], [[Craig Hubley]], [[Fred Bauder]], [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Abe Sokolov]] could easily be developed into a model of what are th

- removal of parties who habitually engage in this behaviour, e.g. [[Erik Moeller]], [[Daniel Mayer]] from any position of responsiblity in Wikimedia, with p

...histories, logs and deleted pages (notably those about people like [[Erik Moeller]]) to find the exact specific [[Wikipedia mailing list]] quotes that back u

...mon [[usurper]] tactic, e.g. employed heavily by [[Auntie Angela]], [[Erik Moeller]], as a prelude to censorship. Important to realize:

...tware imperialism]] and specifically the control of that project by [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Tim Starling]]). Other [[wiki code]] will almost certainly be requ

...or a developer to rig" it becomes possible only for these two individuals, Moeller and Starling, to rig the votes. ''See [[Disinfopedia]] entries on [http:// ...up. In the future this might be of benefit to his friend and ally [[Erik Moeller]] who is a strong opponent of [[English Wikipedia User Anthere]], who won t

...instated [[troll text]] would be themselves subject to [[IP block]]s. But Moeller remains a sysop so this must be considered "policy" on your part. ...finite) (contribs) (trolling / libel against Wikimedia foundation); ..."; Moeller is equating what he calls "[[trolling]]" with [[libel]] which is a legal th

::Recently, on [[m:|Meta-Wikipedia]], Users [[Erik Moeller]] and [[Auntie Angela|Angela Beesley]] agreed that "only the [[community po ::Moeller even advocated openly on the [[Wikipedia IRC channel]] that Wikimedia shoul