Consumerium talk:Executive summary: Difference between revisions
fixed link
(too much abstract waffle on the wiki in general) |
(fixed link) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:No. It is very clear terminology for executives and every sentence says something either about how things are in business now or how we hope to change how the business is. | :No. It is very clear terminology for executives and every sentence says something either about how things are in business now or how we hope to change how the business is. | ||
::No, it's bad writing. It's gone. | ::No, it's bad writing. It's gone. | ||
:Actually I get this feeling about the whole wiki. Following the links from [[Welcome newcomers]], I'm encountering lots of abstract waffle, but struggling to gain an understanding of what its all about. I would guess that you are trying to attract wiki contributions from people with knowledge of consumer issues over a broad range of product types. I also gather that the project has a wider scope, looking at ways of delivering consumer information e.g. devices in supermarkets. Seems like an interesting idea, but it's really not very clear. Maybe this 'Executive summary' is a page where one would expect the language to be thick with management speak, but I would suggest that some of the other pages need some work. This waffle should be replaced by more specific concrete information. - Nojer2 - 29 Nov 2004 | :Actually I get this feeling about the whole wiki. Following the links from [[Consumerium:Welcome, newcomers]], I'm encountering lots of abstract waffle, but struggling to gain an understanding of what its all about. I would guess that you are trying to attract wiki contributions from people with knowledge of consumer issues over a broad range of product types. I also gather that the project has a wider scope, looking at ways of delivering consumer information e.g. devices in supermarkets. Seems like an interesting idea, but it's really not very clear. Maybe this 'Executive summary' is a page where one would expect the language to be thick with management speak, but I would suggest that some of the other pages need some work. This waffle should be replaced by more specific concrete information. - Nojer2 - 29 Nov 2004 | ||
It really must go. Picking good questions of the FAQ is a far better way to go | It really must go. Picking good questions of the FAQ is a far better way to go | ||