Jump to content

Talk:Urban ecology: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))
'f course, anything thought irrelevant to this place, can just fly away to the english wikipedia (where people will either ignore it, or tear it into pieces :-))
:I think if the term is 'out there" and being used by others, it should be in the [[w:urban ecology]] article place, if only so that you can see who else is interested enough ithe concept to edit it, and who then to attract over here.
:Usually the most interesting articles are attacked heavily.  See [[w:wealth]] and [[w:political economy]].  I put three interesting cut-outs in [[political economy]] here, and perhaps we need [[wealth]] and [[power]] stated here too alon with the other key concepts:
*[[safe]], [[done]]
*[[fair]], [[evil]]
*[[ignore]], [[forgive]]
*[[faction]], [[amoral purchasing]]
I think you get all that right, you probably can make [[Consumerium]] work.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.