Develop Wiki: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(this isn't evolving on the talk page, updating and moving here) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The '''Develop Wiki''' | The '''Develop Wiki''', formerly known as '''Development Wiki''' or '''R&D wiki''', is where [[software development concepts]], [[wiki management]] problems, etc., are discussed. It will always reliably be found at [http://develop.consumerium.org develop.consumerium.org] by any reasonable protocol ([[HTTP]], [[FTP]], [[IRC]] etc.). | ||
Eventually other material will be spun off into [[Research Wiki]] which will be a [[large public wiki]] with slightly better [[wiki governance]] under the supervision of the [[Consumerium Governance Organization]]. | |||
Meanwhile, the [[Publish Wiki]] will have only the exact data required to generate the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. Nothing will get to this wiki until it has been debated thoroughly as research, and accepted by at least one [[faction]] as affecting [[individual buying criteria]] for those that trust them to make such decisions. | Meanwhile, the [[Publish Wiki]] will have only the exact data required to generate the [[Consumerium buying signal]]. Nothing will get to this wiki until it has been debated thoroughly as research, and accepted by at least one [[faction]] as affecting [[individual buying criteria]] for those that trust them to make such decisions. | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
A proposed process for information flow from [[Research Wiki]] to [[Publish Wiki]] | A proposed process for information flow from [[Research Wiki]] to [[Publish Wiki]] | ||
:Name choice: The name [[ | :Name choice: The name [[Signal Wiki]] better matches [[Consumerium buying signal]], "[[buying signal wiki]]" would be even clearer. | ||
:Name choice: [[research wiki]] just admits that the opinions we share here are just as valid as the ones one might find in [[Wikipedia]], probably more so, since we really care about solving a [[user-land]] problem, and they don't. | :Name choice: [[research wiki]] just admits that the opinions we share here are just as valid as the ones one might find in [[Wikipedia]], probably more so, since we really care about solving a [[user-land]] problem, and they don't. | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
=== process === | === process === | ||
1. Stupid idea proposed in '''Develop Wiki''' - [[trolls]] attack; Slightly less stupid ideas evolve like bacteria; Years of stupidity and trashing ideas might lead to one good [[90 day sprint]] ever year, two or three [[30 day sprint]]s, and maybe five or six [[14 day sprint]]s. Maybe three to five man years of work per year of [[software development]]. | 1. Stupid idea proposed in '''Develop Wiki''' - [[trolls]] attack, [[gnawing]] it; Slightly less stupid ideas evolve like bacteria into undisputed [[gnawlij]]; Years of stupidity and trashing ideas might lead to one good [[90 day sprint]] ever year, two or three [[30 day sprint]]s, and maybe five or six [[14 day sprint]]s. Maybe three to five man years of work per year of [[software development]]. | ||
2. Based on arguments about above, [[power structure]] evolves in [[Development Wiki]] with loose idea of who will recruit [[trolls]] from where to support what position; Agreement on how to make sure that real user needs, [[random facts]], and other [[user-land]] concerns are respected. For instance, limiting the total number of trolls to recruit from some [[large public wiki]], or requiring the [[faction]] to go find and pay some poor people (even [[cheap outsourced coder]]s) to disagree with them and their [[developed-world point of view]]. Agreements are informal. | 2. Based on arguments about above, [[power structure]] evolves in [[Development Wiki]] with loose idea of who will recruit [[trolls]] from where to support what position; Agreement on how to make sure that real user needs, [[random facts]], and other [[user-land]] concerns are respected. For instance, limiting the total number of trolls to recruit from some [[large public wiki]], or requiring the [[faction]] to go find and pay some poor people (even [[cheap outsourced coder]]s) to disagree with them and their [[developed-world point of view]]. Agreements are informal. | ||