Extreme standards: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(elaborating) |
No edit summary |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* extreme safety: no [[molecule]] of [[dangerous substance]] is allowed to go in or out of this container; [[Gus Kouwenhouven]] is not allowed to sell anyone anything that gets past [[Consumerium buying signal]] | * extreme safety: no [[molecule]] of [[dangerous substance]] is allowed to go in or out of this container; [[Gus Kouwenhouven]] is not allowed to sell anyone anything that gets past [[Consumerium buying signal]] | ||
* mobile robustness into ''extreme environments'': [[flame]] / [[heat]] / [[temperature]] / [[flood]] / [[wind]] / [[explosion]]; any [[worn device]]s used must pass at least some of these | * mobile robustness into ''extreme environments'': [[flame]] / [[heat]] / [[temperature]] / [[flood]] / [[wind]] / [[explosion]]; any [[worn device]]s used must pass at least some of these | ||
Consider also ''[[scorched earth]]''-capable units, which destroy themselves upon [[unauthorized access]], e.g. [[sysop vandalism]] which destroys articles that [[trolls]] care about, simply to demonstrate that the [[sysop power structure]] itself [[Wikimedia corruption|does not care about the articles, and will damage them, and the wiki mission]], simply to anger and discourage those who actually do care, and try to discourage their participation entirely. Such tactics are part of '''extreme standards''' in military and other settings, but in the [[peace and nonviolence]] oriented setting of [[Consumerium Services]] it would be wiser to pursue more [[troll-friendly]] strategies and do [[extreme testing]] of potential [[Research Wiki]] sources, such as [[Wikinfo]], [[Wikipedia]] and [[Disinfopedia]]. This may help [[test to destruction]] the [[sysop power structure]] which is doing such damage to the [[GFDL corpus]]. |