Jump to content

Philosophy: Difference between revisions

9 bytes added ,  13 August 2004
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
::Certainly, foes of [[philosophy as usual]] have included many tyrants, but some [[GodKing]]s have also embraced [[philosophy]] as a way to turn dissent and calls for serious change into meaningless talk.  It is this that is wrong more than the philosophy itself.
::Certainly, foes of [[philosophy as usual]] have included many tyrants, but some [[GodKing]]s have also embraced [[philosophy]] as a way to turn dissent and calls for serious change into meaningless talk.  It is this that is wrong more than the philosophy itself.


: ''There is no formal way 2 solve human problems. Such as: don't use this word. Don't use philosphy or negro. People will find other ways 2 express what they intend 2. Words are only symptoms. There is no way around the need 2 individually judge sentences and situations with respect 2 their meaning and their positive or negative effects. There is no formal way 2 replace individual judgements. --T2R''
: ''There is no formal way 2 solve human problems. Such as: don't use this word. Don't use ''philosophy'' or ''negro''. People will find other ways 2 express what they intend 2. Words are just symptoms. There is no way around the need 2 individually judge sentences and situations with respect 2 their meaning and their positive or negative effects. There is no formal way 2 replace individual judgements. --T2R''


::Some people do believe in [[moral cognition]] though.
::Some people do believe in [[moral cognition]] though.
Anonymous user
We use only those cookies necessary for the functioning of the website.