Philosophy: Difference between revisions
is it the philosophy or the purpose it is put to which is wrong?
No edit summary |
(is it the philosophy or the purpose it is put to which is wrong?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
For | ''For the un[[trolled]] tale see [[Consumerium:Philosophy] - if you can buy it.'' | ||
Some people have tried to invent "the Consumerium school of pro-troll philosophy" out of plain old [[troll-friendly]] policy and [[New Troll point of view]]. This is silly. But to help those of you who just love big ideologies: | Some people have tried to invent "the Consumerium school of pro-troll philosophy" out of plain old [[troll-friendly]] policy and [[New Troll point of view]]. This is silly. But to help those of you who just love big ideologies: | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
: ''I wonder why people - like the author above - so often feel T need 2 tell other people what's right or wrong. Or: what language 2 use or not 2 use. To say "just forget" means "let me think for U" and this is, quite simple, bad style and a bad idea. -- T2R'' | : ''I wonder why people - like the author above - so often feel T need 2 tell other people what's right or wrong. Or: what language 2 use or not 2 use. To say "just forget" means "let me think for U" and this is, quite simple, bad style and a bad idea. -- T2R'' | ||
::Certainly, foes of [[philosophy as usual]] have included many tyrants, but some [[GodKing]]s have also embraced [[philosophy]] as a way to turn dissent and calls for serious change into meaningless talk. It is this that is wrong more than the philosophy itself. | |||