Good enough: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[Trolls]] notably have difficulty accepting anything as being '''good enough''' and may need encouragement in this acceptance from other [[faction]]s. | [[Trolls]] notably have difficulty accepting anything as being '''good enough''' and may need encouragement in this acceptance from other [[faction]]s. | ||
[[Consumerium Governance Organization]] must be the ultimate arbiter of what is '''good enough''' to actually get [[Consumerium Services]] running and the [[Consumerium buying signal]] influencing [[point of purchase]] decisions. | [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] must be the ultimate arbiter of what is '''good enough''' to actually get [[Consumerium Services]] running and the [[Consumerium buying signal]] influencing [[point of purchase]] decisions. It can and should schedule regular re-examination of concepts that are perhaps not '''good enough''' for [[Transparent Consumerium]] or for [[Distributed Consumerium]], and should have plenty of time in advance to re-examine the whole [[healthy buying infrastructure]]. | ||
A list of things that are already '''good enough''' to build [[software]] on: | |||
:[[Develop Wiki]] - [[mediawiki]] is good enough to coordinate development with | |||
:[[Faction]] model - this can evolve as actual people arrive with actual basic differences, and realize their ideas about what is a [[Good Thing]] vary and the [[worst practices]] they hate most also vary | |||
:[[Trollist]] ideology - well established, this is a [[troll-friendly]] wiki, so what? Let this truth trigger [[wiki regime change]] to destroy [[Wikimedia corruption]], and let it happen slowly so [[trolls]] can enjoy the pain of the [[sysop power structure]] as it dies | |||
:[[Lowest Troll]] has proven himself good enough and fair enough to run at least the development side, though he may not be right to run [[Research Wiki]] or [[Publish Wiki]] and certainly can't determine "what is just an Opinion" on his or her own | |||
:[[healthy signal infrastructure]] model - there are enough requirements here to constrain the problem and help choose working parts, that's all that we need, nothing could be unhealthier than having no [[Consumerium Services]] at all | |||
:[[healthy buying infrastructure]] subset of that model - basically this must evolve by rendezvous as [[essential projects]] start to converge with this one | |||
:[[E Prime]] and [[glossary]] probably are good enough now in English only, that is, there are only so many essential concepts, or basic words in any [[language]], what these need now is [[translation]], e.g. into [[French]], [[Finnish]], [[Spanish]], to identify ways the words have subtle differences | |||
:''add more things that are good enough'' | |||
--------- | |||
If you disagree, just move the thing to [[Talk:Good enough|the talk page]]. If you disagree with that move, well, too bad, it's obviously not good enough yet, so work on improving it before you add it to this list again. | |||