Talk:New Troll point of view: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
It's interesting to have this essay sit in [[New Troll point of view]] itself where it may attract maximum [[trolling]] attention from New Trolls trying to figure out what to do or disagree with (if they disagreed with nothing they'd not be [[trolls]], would they?). Initially the temptation is there to put links to [[troll-friendly]] and [[world tree]] and etc., but this shouldn't happen because that reinforces the "Old Troll point of view" over new ones. | It's interesting to have this essay sit in [[New Troll point of view]] itself where it may attract maximum [[trolling]] attention from New Trolls trying to figure out what to do or disagree with (if they disagreed with nothing they'd not be [[trolls]], would they?). Initially the temptation is there to put links to [[troll-friendly]] and [[world tree]] and etc., but this shouldn't happen because that reinforces the "Old Troll point of view" over new ones. | ||
[[Trolls]] eat philosophy rather than preach it. There is no "Consumerium philosophy", certainly, but, there is an approach and a [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] perhaps to sanction a [[Lowest Troll]] to attempt that approach in the long run. This essay is a good start, and trolls will gnaw on it for a while in the dark. | [[Trolls]] eat philosophy rather than preach it. There is no "Consumerium philosophy", certainly, but, there is an approach and a [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] perhaps to sanction a [[Lowest Troll]] to attempt that approach in the long run. It is really all about having NO philosophy and just choosing only the next best step to do least harm. | ||
But, some people do seem to need these [[ideology]] statements to get comfort with what is going on. This essay is a good start, and trolls will gnaw on it for a while in the dark. Then we will write something that totally disagrees. ;-) | |||