Talk:New Troll point of view: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
(w:User:Timwi on the vile mailing list) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
---- | ---- | ||
The essay is a very useful snapshot from a [[New Troll point of view|new troll]] who is obviously trolling us. Under [[soft security]] ideology he would be "harming the community" and it would be time for [[sysop vigilantiism]]. Thankfully here the established [[trolls]] should just troll back: "the best situation is where individuals can have bad reputations, but no one can ever have a good reputation." This is absolutely correct from the point of view of many established trolls. | |||
It's interesting to have this essay sit in [[New Troll point of view]] itself where it may attract maximum [[trolling]] attention from New Trolls trying to figure out what to do or disagree with (if they disagreed with nothing they'd not be [[trolls]], would they?). Initially the temptation is there to put links to [[troll-friendly]] and [[world tree]] and etc., but this shouldn't happen because that reinforces the "Old Troll point of view" over new ones. | |||
[[Trolls]] eat philosophy rather than preach it. There is no "Consumerium philosophy", certainly, but, there is an approach and a [[Consumerium Governance Organization]] perhaps to sanction a [[Lowest Troll]] to attempt that approach in the long run. This essay is a good start, and trolls will gnaw on it for a while in the dark. | |||